Disqualification Criteria
At CodeCall, we hold our reviewers to the highest of standards to ensure that businesses receive the best possible code. To maintain integrity and quality, we have established disqualification criteria to address issues of inexperience, negligence, or unethical behavior.
Criteria for Disqualification
Invalid Submission Approvals
If a reviewer approves a significant number of submissions, and over 75% of these are later deemed invalid by other reviewers, the reviewer will be disqualified.
Example: Approving 20 submissions where 15 or more are found to be invalid.
Excessive Reliance on AI
While AI can assist in generating reports, reviewers are expected to critically assess and refine these reports. Reliance on AI without proper review or iteration can lead to disqualification.
Unethical Behavior
Any form of blackmail, bribery, or collusion with developers to manipulate the competition results is strictly forbidden and will result in immediate disqualification.
Submission Timeliness
Submissions must be made within the designated project window. Late submissions may lead to disqualification.
Note: These disqualification criteria apply to both reviewers and engineers to ensure a fair and competitive environment.
Last updated