Code Call
  • Code Call 💻
  • Engineers Docs 🧑‍💻
    • Quick Start
    • How To Present Your Contributions
    • How To Evaluate Contribution Type
    • Submission Validity
    • Appeals
    • Payouts
    • 💸Invoicing Guidelines
    • Experience Points
  • Reviewer Docs 🧑‍⚖️
    • The Reviewing Process
    • How Reviewers Works
    • Reviewing Eligibility
    • Disqualification Criteria
    • Payouts and Rewards
  • Businesses 👔
    • The Development Process
    • Our Recommendations
    • Project Types
    • Assessment Process
    • Early Withdrawal Policy
    • Create a Project
  • Contributors 🧑‍🏫
    • 👩‍🎓Education and Training Contributions
    • 🤝Sponsors and Partners
    • 👨‍💼Referring Businesses
    • 🛠️Useful Tools
    • 🔧Release Notes
  • 🎮Geeky Section!
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Discord
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Overview of reviewing Phases
  • reviewing
  1. Reviewer Docs 🧑‍⚖️

The Reviewing Process

PreviousExperience PointsNextHow Reviewers Works

Last updated 8 months ago

The Reviewing phase is a vital part of CodeCall's competitive development projects, ensuring that our projects are fair, transparent, and uphold the highest standards of integrity.

Here's a detailed overview of how the judging process works.

Overview of reviewing Phases

We divide the reviewing process into two phases:

  1. Reviewing Phase

  2. Evaluation Phase

Both phases occur after the contest's closed submission window, typically lasting around 1 week. Once reviewing begins, further submissions will be disabled.

reviewing

All eligible members can participate in the reviewing phase as reviewers. Each project will have 3 reviewers which one of these will be a random pick of lead reviewer for the project.

Reviewers will use the discord server to submit their assessments for review for each contest, earning rewards based on their performance and accuracy.

For more information on reviewing and eligibility, check out our detailed guide .

At CodeCall, we are dedicated to maintaining a reviewing process that is fair and transparent. We consistently refine our methods to adhere to best practices, ensuring that every participant receives comprehensive and impartial feedback.

here